Mark to Market (MTM): What It Means in Accounting, Finance & Investing

Definition

Mark-to-market or fair value accounting allows for measuring the fair value of accounts, such as assets and liabilities, based on their current market price.

Mark-to-market (MTM) accounting is a valuation method that values assets and liabilities based on what they could be bought or sold for in today's marketplace rather than their original price. This approach gives a real-time snapshot of financial worth, like checking your investment portfolio's value on a given day.

MTM originated in futures trading but has become fundamental to modern accounting and investment practices. When banks, investment firms, or corporations use MTM accounting, they're essentially asking: "What is this asset worth if we had to sell it right now?" While MTM accounting can provide greater transparency about an organization's true financial position, it can also introduce significant volatility during market disruptions.

Key Takeaways

  • Mark to market (MTM) is a method of valuing assets and liabilities based on current market conditions.
  • MTM is crucial for providing transparency and accuracy in financial statements.
  • The Financial Accounting Standards Board (FASB) provides guidelines for MTM under generally accepted accounting principles (GAAP).
  • MTM can lead to volatility in financial statements during unstable market conditions.


Mark to Market

Investopedia / Laura Porter

What Is Mark to Market (MTM)?

MTM accounting is based on the principle of fair value accounting, which prioritizes current market prices over historical costs. This method regularly updates asset and liability valuations to ensure financial statements reflect an organization's true financial position. For example, mutual funds recalculate their net asset value (NAV) daily using MTM to give investors an up-to-date picture of their investment's worth.

Tip

MTM accounting can serve as a financial reality check during normal times, but can become a self-fulfilling prophecy during market panics when liquidity disappears.

The concept originated in futures markets, where traders and brokerages needed to adjust their margin accounts daily. MTM later became a cornerstone of corporate accounting standards, particularly after the FASB formalized guidelines. This standardization helps protect investors and regulators from misleading financial statements by requiring assets to be valued at the price they would fetch in an orderly market transaction.

MTM accounting provides transparency but can magnify reported losses during market downturns. For example, suppose a bank holds a portfolio of mortgages, and the housing market begins to crash. This would require the bank to mark down these assets to their current market value, potentially reducing its equity base significantly—even if the bank plans to hold these assets long-term.

Accounting Standards and Guidelines

The FASB requires MTM accounting for certain financial instruments through GAAP. This framework was significantly shaped by FASB Statement No. 157, which defines fair value as "the price that would be received to sell an asset or paid to transfer a liability in an orderly transaction between market participants."

To apply this definition consistently, FASB created a three-level system for categorizing assets based on the reliability of available market information:

Level 1 assets have readily observable market prices, like publicly traded stocks on major exchanges. If you own shares of Apple Inc. (AAPL), for instance, determining their value is as simple as checking the latest trading price.

Level 2 assets don't have direct market quotes but can be valued using comparable market data. These might include corporate bonds that don't trade frequently but can be priced by referencing similar bonds with recent transactions.

Level 3 assets are usually pretty illiquid or have opaque pricing in the market, requiring companies to use internal models and assumptions for valuation. These might include private equity investments, complex derivatives, or distressed debt in frozen markets. Because these valuations rely heavily on management judgment, they are the most scrutinized by auditors and regulators.

This tiered approach acknowledges a fundamental reality of markets—some assets are more straightforward to value accurately than others.

Mark to Market in Finance

Financial institutions use MTM accounting to adjust their loan portfolios based on credit risk. When a bank issues loans, it creates an "allowance for credit losses" account that cushions against expected defaults. As loan quality deteriorates, the bank increases this allowance, effectively marking down the value of its receivables even before actual defaults occur.

A 2023 regional banking crisis in the U.S. demonstrated how MTM can create unexpected challenges. When interest rates rose rapidly, banks holding long-dated Treasury bonds—traditionally considered among the safest investments—faced substantial unrealized losses. Silicon Valley Bank (SVB), for instance, had invested heavily in government bonds when interest rates were low. When rates climbed, the market value of these bonds fell dramatically. Though the bonds would still pay their full face value at maturity, SVB was forced to recognize billions in MTM losses when it needed to sell these assets to meet deposit withdrawals. This ultimately triggered the bank's collapse.

This scenario highlights a crucial aspect of MTM accounting and its effect on balance sheets: it directly links market swings and a company's reported financial strength. As asset values decline, equity capital shrinks, too, potentially triggering real problems for banks and other institutions. Conversely, MTM can inflate reported earnings and capital during market bubbles, creating a false sense of financial strength when caution is warranted.

For banks, regulations like Basel III include provisions to mitigate some of MTM's procyclical effects. For example, certain securities can be classified as "held to maturity," allowing them to be carried at amortized cost rather than market value—but only if the institution can credibly demonstrate both the intent and ability to hold them until they mature.

Real-World Applications of Mark to Market

MTM accounting shapes financial decisions across numerous sectors of the economy, from Wall Street trading desks to retail investment accounts. Understanding these practical applications helps clarify why this valuation method remains essential despite its drawbacks.

Investment Management Applications

Portfolio managers rely on MTM valuation to provide accurate daily performance metrics to clients and regulators. A mutual fund's NAV is perhaps the clearest example—each day at market close, every security in the fund is marked to its closing price, creating a precise snapshot of the fund's worth.

For hedge funds and private equity firms, MTM becomes more complex since they tend to have more Level 3 assets. A venture capital firm investing in startups might mark its portfolio companies to value based on the most recent funding round prices. However, between funding events, the firm must regularly reassess valuations based on comparable public companies, recent private transactions, or changes in financial performance—a process that combines market data with significant room for subjective judgments.

Derivatives and Risk Management

Suppose a major agricultural goods company sells futures contracts in June to lock in the price for the October harvest. Each day until October, the company and the counterparty will see their margin accounts adjusted based on price moves.

Corporate risk management programs similarly use MTM for ongoing assessment. An airline that hedges jet fuel costs through swap contracts must regularly mark these positions to market. During the 2020 pandemic, many airlines had significant MTM losses on fuel hedges when oil prices collapsed, creating financial reporting challenges even as their actual operations benefited from lower fuel costs.

MTM for Individual Investors

Individual investors encounter MTM principles every time they check their brokerage accounts. The displayed portfolio value reflects present market prices, not their original investment amount. This real-time feedback helps investors make informed decisions but can also trigger emotional responses during periods of market volatility.

The Bottom Line

MTM accounting provides transparency in financial reporting by showing what assets are worth today rather than what was paid for them in the past. This approach helps investors, regulators, and managers make better-informed decisions in normal market conditions.

However, as demonstrated during crises like the 2008 financial meltdown and the 2023 regional banking turmoil, MTM can amplify market stress when asset prices plummet because of temporary liquidity freezes rather than fundamental value changes.

Article Sources
Investopedia requires writers to use primary sources to support their work. These include white papers, government data, original reporting, and interviews with industry experts. We also reference original research from other reputable publishers where appropriate. You can learn more about the standards we follow in producing accurate, unbiased content in our editorial policy.
  1. Financial Accounting Standards Board. "Summary of Statement No. 157

  2. Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System. “Material Loss Review of Silicon Valley Bank "

  3. Ernst & Young. "Basel III Endgame: What You Need to Know."

Open a New Bank Account
×
The offers that appear in this table are from partnerships from which Investopedia receives compensation. This compensation may impact how and where listings appear. Investopedia does not include all offers available in the marketplace.
Open a New Bank Account
×
The offers that appear in this table are from partnerships from which Investopedia receives compensation. This compensation may impact how and where listings appear. Investopedia does not include all offers available in the marketplace.

Related Articles